Journal of Interreligious Studies on the Quran and the Bible

Journal of Interreligious Studies on the Quran and the Bible

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Surah Ṭāhā based on James Paul Gee's Model

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Arv.C, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, IRAN.
Abstract
This study conducts a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of the dialogue between Moses and God in Surah Ṭāhā of the Quran based on James Paul Gee’s discourse analysis framework. Drawing on Gee’s building tasks and tools of inquiry, the research investigates how divine-human interaction linguistically constructs identities, relationships, power relations, and theological meanings within a sacred text. Adopting a mixed-methods descriptive-analytic design, the study integrates quantitative frequency analysis of discourse features with qualitative interpretation of contextualized meanings and figured worlds. The findings reveal that identity construction and relationship building are the most prominent building tasks in the Moses-God discourse, highlighting the centrality of prophetic identity formation and divine authority. Among Gee’s tools of inquiry, situated meanings and figured worlds occur most frequently, indicating that theological concepts are communicated through context-dependent meanings and implicit models of divine–human relations. The analysis further demonstrates that power relations are asymmetrical yet compassionate, combining divine sovereignty with responsiveness to human concerns. By applying Gee’s comprehensive framework to Quranic discourse, this study bridges traditional Quranic exegesis with contemporary linguistic analysis. It contributes to critical discourse studies by extending the applicability of CDA to religious texts and demonstrates the analytical value of Gee’s model in examining spiritually and theologically complex discourse. Ultimately, the research advances interdisciplinary dialogue between linguistics and theology and enriches the critical study of sacred scriptures.
Keywords

Albakry, M; Hancock, P. H. (2008 AD). "Linguistic Variation and Word Choice in Islamic Sermons: A Sociolinguistic Study." International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 190, 37-66.
El-Sharif, A. (2012 AD). "Metaphors We Believe by: Islamic Doctrine as Evoked by the Prophet Muhammad's Metaphors." Critical Discourse Studies. 9(3), 231-245.
Fairclough, N; Wodak, R. (1997 AD). "Critical Discourse Analysis." In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. (pp. 258-284). Sage Publications.
Gee, J. P. (2007 AD). What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gee, J. P. (2011 AD). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 3rd Ed. Routledge.
Kouega, J. P; Baimada, F. G. (2012 AD). "Language Use in the Islamic Faith in Cameroon: The Case of a Mosque in the City of Maroua." Journal of Language and Culture. 3(1), 10-19.
Moscovici, S. (2000 AD). Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Polity Press.
Panjwani, F. (2012 AD). "Constructing Identities in a Contested Religious Space: Islam and Religious Education in England." Religious Education. 107(3), 257-274.
Reisigl, M; Wodak, R. (2016 AD). "The Discourse-historical Approach." In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies. 3rd Ed. pp. 23-61). Sage Publications.
Rogers, R. (2011 AD). An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. 2nd Ed. Routledge.
Rosowsky, A. (2013 AD). "Religious Literacy through a Multilingual Lens." In V. Lee, P. Seargeant, & J. Moody (Eds.), English in Multilingual Religious Contexts. (pp. 124-147). Bloomsbury Academic.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009 AD). Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge University Press.
Online Resources
https://anhaar.com
https://quran.makarem.ir